Theoretical analysis of the impact of normalizing composite quality indicator components on their extrema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v15i3.2057Keywords:
individual quality indicators, composite quality indicator, quality management tools, normalization, extremum analysisAbstract
Quality assessment of complex objects commonly employs composite quality indicators constructed from weighted individual quality indicators and management tools. When these variables differ in units or ranges, normalization to dimensionless values in [0, 1] is required. This transformation yields an alternative quality model whose extremum characteristics may differ from those of the original non-normalized model. This issue has received limited attention in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of parameter normalization on the extremum of a composite quality indicator. The analysis considers general quality models based on weighted arithmetic, harmonic, geometric, and quadratic mean aggregation functions, each evaluated with and without normalization of individual quality indicators. The results reveal that normalization affects both the location and type of the extremum, as well as the optimal values of quality management tools, for arithmetic, harmonic, and quadratic mean convolutions. Notably, for the weighted geometric mean, the optimal management tool value is independent of normalization, making this convolution particularly suitable for practical quality management. These findings provide a foundation for developing dedicated back-transformation methodologies to ensure accurate real-world application of results obtained from normalized quality models.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anatolyi Dolzhanskiy, Oksana Bondarenko, Oleh Brahynskyi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Users are free to
- share, i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
- adapt, i.e. remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
At the same time, the user must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Additional information about the license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Authors are
- able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).