Implementations and pilot comparison of primary low intensity shock calibration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v5i3.314Abstract
This paper first presents two main technical concerns for a possible low intensity shock comparison: variety of primary shock calibration systems and feasibility of comparison artifact. For the primary calibration system, the mechanical excitation includes hammer-anvil collision, pneumatic driven projectile impact and Hopkinson bar. The shock pulses generated are smooth monopole shape by the first two types with air bearings, but dipole shape by the third type. For the comparison artifact, a standard accelerometer of single-ended type with a charge amplifier consists of an accelerometer measuring chain whose nonlinearity of amplitude and phase frequency responses is investigated. Based on the nonlinear fact of comparison artifact at frequency domain and the spectrum range difference of mechanical excitations of the calibration system, strict comparison conditions had to be laid down for measurement of shock sensitivity at specific acceleration levels and pulse durations.
The pilot comparison, coded as APMP.AUV.V-P1, is successfully organized by Asia Pacific Metrology Programme. Some comparison results of both monopole excitation and dipole excitation are shown with the expanded uncertainty. The completion of this pilot comparison can serve as part of the basis for a planned key comparison targeted at a low intensity shock range at Consultative Committee level.Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).