Proficiency tests with uncertainty information: analysis using the maximum likelihood method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v5i3.376Abstract
In this study, we report the application of the maximum likelihood method to the analysis of proficiency test data when uncertainty information is given and a reference laboratory does not exist. There are two causes that could impair the quality of analysis using the maximum likelihood method: the existence of an unknown random effect, and outliers. The conditions under which performance evaluations can be appropriately conducted are discussed in this study. To avoid serious impacts from these two causes, the maximum permissible standard uncertainty of an unknown random effect and the minimum permissible standard uncertainty of the values reported by a participating laboratory are quantified. Through simulations, the maximum and the minimum permissible standard uncertainties are found to be 0.3 and 0.5 times the intermediate magnitude of the standard uncertainty that the participants are expected to report. We believe that our proposed procedure based on these criteria is sufficiently simple to be employed in actual proficiency tests.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Users are free to
- share, i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
- adapt, i.e. remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
At the same time, the user must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Additional information about the license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Authors are
- able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).