Evaluation of the elastic modulus of concrete using non-destructive ultrasonic methods and the natural vibration method

Authors

  • Aline Marçal da Rocha Laboratory of Ultrasound (LABUS), Directory of Scientific and Industrial Metrology (DIMCI), National Institute of Metrology, Quality, and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias – RJ, Brazil
  • Tiago C. Dourado Laboratory of Ultrasound (LABUS), Directory of Scientific and Industrial Metrology (DIMCI), National Institute of Metrology, Quality, and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias – RJ, Brazil
  • Sandro A. Miqueleti Laboratory of Ultrasound (LABUS), Directory of Scientific and Industrial Metrology (DIMCI), National Institute of Metrology, Quality, and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias – RJ, Brazil
  • Robson Luis Gaiofatto Concrete Laboratory, Engineering Computing Center, Catholic University of Petrópolis, Rua Barão do Amazonas, 124 - Centro, Petrópolis – RJ, Brazil
  • Rodrigo P. B. Costa-Felix Laboratory of Ultrasound (LABUS), Directory of Scientific and Industrial Metrology (DIMCI), National Institute of Metrology, Quality, and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias – RJ, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v14i3.2024

Keywords:

modulus of elasticity dynamic, ultrasonic testing in concrete, natural vibration method

Abstract

The compressive strength of concrete is one of the main indicators of structural safety, quality, and durability. However, for designers, the modulus of elasticity is equally essential during the structural modelling phase, as it directly influences the behaviour of the material under load. In this study, the dynamic modulus of elasticity was obtained and evaluated by means of the ultrasound method, and compared with the results obtained by the excitation method using the Sonelastic® system. A set of 48 cylindrical concrete samples with different strengths was used, allowing comparisons between the acoustic methods in different strength classes. The data were essential to validate the dynamic modulus estimates and verify their compatibility with the normative values. Based on these parameters, measurements were monitored at 14 and 28 days, the latter being considered as a reference. The measurements facilitated comparisons between the acoustic methods selected for estimating the dynamic modulus of elasticity, as well as comparisons with the static modulus of elasticity results established by the ABNT NBR 6118:2023 standard. The evaluation of metrological performance was carried out using standardized errors, which verified the compatibility of the results obtained with the normative methods.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Research Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Aline Marçal da Rocha, Tiago C. Dourado, Sandro A. Miqueleti, Robson Luis Gaiofatto, Rodrigo P. B. Costa-Felix

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Users are free to

  • share, i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
  • adapt, i.e. remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

At the same time, the user must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Additional information about the license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors are

  • able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).