Improved approaches of automated lung segmentation on digital tomosynthesis images
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v6i4.475Abstract
For lung screening the most common method is chest radiography, which produces summation images without giving any depth information about the lung. Computed Tomography (CT) creates excellent slice images, which give volume data that makes CT a more sensitive nodule detection system. However, CT has disadvantages, it is too expensive and its x-ray emission is too high to be used as an everyday screening method. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS), as a relatively new chest imaging modality, can be positioned between chest radiography and CT. While it produces slice images of the chest similarly to CT, its slice thickness is larger, it creates a bit more blurred slices, it has much lower radiation than CT. This blurring makes it hard to segment the lung areas automatically, which is essential for an efficient Computer-aided Diagnosis system. The paper proposes a combined method, which starts from a previously published approach, extends it using snake methods and adjacent images’ segmentation information to improve lung segmentation. Experiments show that the combination of methods reduces the incorrectly segmented lung region.Downloads
Published
2017-12-28
Issue
Section
Research Papers
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).