Key comparisons: the chance for discrepant results and some consequences
AbstractThe paper reports an analysis of the results of complete sets of key comparisons available on the BIPM repository (KCDB), which shows that the majority of them show some discrepant results. The main reason of this fact is due to unknown or ill-estimated systematic effects, and indicates that the usual method of 'correcting' for known systematic effects is inefficient. The paper then discusses some of the possible reasons and an alternative approach, starting from a proposed revision of the meaning of systematic effect/error.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).