Defect detection in stainless steel tubes with AMR and GMR sensors using remote field eddy current inspection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v4i2.234Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of the giant magneto-resistor (GMR) and anisotropic magneto-resistor (AMR) sensors for remote field eddy current testing in stainless steel tubes. Two remote field eddy current probes were built to compare detection and characterization capabilities in standard defects like longitudinal and transverse defects. Both probes include a coil to produce a sinusoidal magnetic field that penetrates the tube wall. Each probe includes a detector with GMR and AMR sensors, where each sensor has four magneto-resistive elements configured in a Wheatstone bridge. Each sensor needs to be biased differently to operate in the high sensitivity linear mode. The description of the measurement system used to detect defects is present in the paper. For the choice of the detector optimal position, numerical simulation and experimental measurements were performed. For comparison of these sensors in defect detection using remote field eddy current testing, the experimental measurements were performed under the same conditions. The results are presented and discussed in the paper.Downloads
Published
2015-06-29
Issue
Section
Research Papers
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).