Monitoring and evaluation of regulation on pesticide labelling and packaging leaflets in Brazil: A conceptual model and indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v14i3.2031Keywords:
pesticide labeling and packaging leaflets, monitoring and evaluation, indicators and metrics, multicriteria decision-making methods, fuzzy logicAbstract
This study introduces a conceptual model for selecting and ranking key indicators to monitor and evaluate the outcomes of the current regulation of pesticide and wood preservative labelling and packaging leaflets in Brazil. Utilising a hybrid approach that integrates fuzzy logic with multicriteria decision-making methods (AHP and TOPSIS), the model identifies and ranks 69 key indicators aligned with the regulation’s expected outcomes. This study addresses two critical gaps in the literature: i) the lack of conceptual models to define key indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of regulation on pesticide labels and leaflets at the national level; and ii) the need for a multi-criteria methodological approach combined with fuzzy logic theory to select and rank key indicators to monitor and evaluate the outcomes of pesticide labelling and packaging leaflet regulations. By mapping inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes in a logical model, this study provides a systematic framework for regulatory agencies and stakeholders. These findings underscore the importance of stakeholder collaboration, capacity building, and alignment with international standards. Future research should explore the behavioural impacts of improved labelling and the scalability of this model to other regulatory contexts.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jessica Peres Medeiros, Maria Fatima Ludovico de Almeida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Users are free to
- share, i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
- adapt, i.e. remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
At the same time, the user must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Additional information about the license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Authors are
- able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).