Comparative analysis of physical models of two-electrode conductivity cells with end and lateral liquid supplies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v13i4.1763Keywords:
Conductometry, two-electrode conductivity cell, resistance bias, finite element analysisAbstract
This article presents a physical model of a two-electrode conductivity cell with holes for filling located in the electrodes. The study investigates the non-uniformity of the current density distribution within the cell, caused by the presence of these holes. Using the finite element method (FEM), the electrical resistance bias of the cell is calculated and compared to an idealized model - a liquid column with specific geometric dimensions and a uniform field inside. A comparison of the resistance bias values between two models - one with end holes (located in the electrodes) and one with lateral liquid supply - is conducted. The results demonstrate that the resistance bias is highly dependent on the diameter of the holes and is mostly unaffected by their position. In most cases, the resistance bias of the model with holes in the electrodes is 3–6 % lower in absolute value compared to the model with side holes, assuming identical geometric parameters for the cell; meanwhile, the bias signs are opposite for these models.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Oleksii Stennik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Users are free to
- share, i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially;
- adapt, i.e. remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
At the same time, the user must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Additional information about the license can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Authors are
- able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).