Remote post-mortem veterinary meat inspections in bovine and analysis of post-mortem inspection outcomes: preliminary results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v13i1.1686Keywords:
Bovines, Viscera, Remote post-mortem inspectionAbstract
The work aimed to collect and analyse data obtained from the routine post-mortem veterinary inspection of bovine viscera and to evaluate the reliability of remote veterinary meat inspections. A comparative study was conducted on viscera belonging to 30 bovines. For each bovine, findings were recorded simultaneously by two veterinarians, one conducting an on-site post-mortem inspection and another performing the remote inspection through a tablet. A total of 10 (33.33 %) bovines were healthy. In a total of 18 (60.00 %) and 11 animals (33.00 %) pulmonary and hepatic lesions were respectively, observed. The most reported finding was pleuritis recorded in 17 animals (56.67 %), followed by pneumonia (16.67 %). The agreement between the two methods used for the post-mortem inspection of bovines was generally high. In an overall 73.33 % of bovines the findings recorded by the veterinarian who conducted the on-site post-mortem inspection and those recorded by the veterinarian performing the remote inspection were overlapping. In conclusion, a move to a remote post-mortem inspection has a negligible negative impact on public health since the most frequently detected lesions recorded were of scarce significance and in most cases, they were effectively detected by the veterinarian through the tablet.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Francesca Peruzy, Valeria Vuoso, Claudio Felicani, Giuseppe Cotturone, Kurt Houf, Nicoletta Murru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).